Exercise prescription dose for castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients: a phase I prescription dose escalation trial.

Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. renee.bultijnck@ugent.be. Research Foundation, Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium. renee.bultijnck@ugent.be. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Department of Physical Activity, Nutrition and Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Research Foundation, Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.

World journal of urology. 2021;(2):357-364
Full text from:

Abstract

PURPOSE To determine the start exercise prescription dose in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving second-line hormone treatment and recommended phase II exercise prescription. METHODS Patients were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation phase I trial of aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises to evaluate dose-limiting tolerance and safety. Tolerance was defined as Borg score ≤ 16 and safety (pain) as a visual analogue scale score (VAS) ≤ 3 and CTCAE grade < 2. Dose level 1 (escalation start dose) was set at 15 min. Aerobic training (50-80% HRmax warm-up and cooling-down; and 65-80% HRmax. core), 1 set with 8-10 repetitions (reps.) resistance training (50-60% 1-RM, 8 exercises), and 1 set (30s) with 2 reps flexibility training (5 exercises). The prescription dose escalation was designed in four levels (from dose -1 to 3), with a dose escalation in volume and intensity of the exercises. RESULTS Nine patients were included in two dosing cohorts and were under active treatment (n = 4 abiraterone acetate and n = 5 enzalutamide). Dose limiting safety concerns were observed in 2 out of 3 patients in dose level 2 and 1 patient out of 6 in dose level 1 due to VAS > 3 during resistance training and/or flexibility training. No tolerance issues were observed in the two dosing cohorts. The optimal start exercise prescription dose was set at dose level 1 due to safety issues at dose level 2. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that exercise is perceived tolerable in mCRPC patients receiving second-line hormone therapy. Caution is indicated on safety during performance of the exercises.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Clinical Trial

Metadata

MeSH terms : Exercise Therapy